System uptake
— on —; — plans approved in the latest submission log.
LOCAS · As at —
Ministry of Mines & Minerals Development
Two speeds of compliance in Zambia's mining sector
A live snapshot from LOCAS system extracts — compliance workbook, submission log, and penalty register — showing where operators excel at filings and where enforcement is accelerating.
Transparency gap
Only — on —. — operators miss public plan disclosure.
Enforcement surge
— across — live penalty lines · — tied to Kagem local-content matters.
—
Licensed operators
75 in scope · test mine excluded
—
Plan approval rate
— approved in LOCAS
—
Tender records
Median — per company
—
Penalty exposure (ZMW)
— issued lines
01
Compliance landscape
Compliance rates below use the workbook matrix (— rows). The company breakdown covers — operators aligned with the — licensed sector count (Ministry test mine removed; Big Mountain counted once). —
Strong · Internal LOCAS
—
Procurement plans in LOCAS — strongest obligation in the matrix.
Weak · Public & people
—
Training and public disclosure — widest gaps and rising penalty activity in live LOCAS.
Obligation scorecard
Compliance rate comparison
% compliant · — workbook rows · — in LOCAS scope · —
Regulatory read-through
- — companies — no public procurement plan disclosure.
- 23 companies — tender reporting gaps (Q1 matrix).
- — companies — training non-compliance. View list →
- Matrix updated from working workbook; cross-check with live penalties for enforcement.
Insight
Most operators meet — (—), but only — on — — the gap regulators should message before the next deadline cycle.
↳
Company breakdown by obligation
Drill into each compliance category from the workbook matrix. Use filters to list operators who did not meet training requirements, or switch category to see gaps in public disclosure and tenders.
Obligation category
Show companies
Training participation
Loading…
| # | Company | Status | Other gaps (workbook) |
|---|
Source: compliance workbook · Red mark = non-compliant · Green = compliant · Blank or other = unknown / not recorded
02
System activity
Latest submission per company from submission_summary.xlsx (as at —). — operators logged zero tenders; top six account for — of volume.
Tender activity distribution
Companies per activity band · latest LOCAS submission
Flagship reporters
Share of sector tender total
| Company | Tenders | Share |
|---|
Engagement paradox
— operators lack an approved procurement plan in LOCAS while — logged zero tenders — overlap suggests inactive or non-compliant registrants.
No approved procurement plan
| Company | Latest tenders logged |
|---|
03
Enforcement & financial exposure
Live penalty register: — issued lines totalling — across — companies (as at —). — matters issued in the last 7 days (—).
Penalty value by category
LOCAS penalty_summary.xlsx · all issued lines · click a segment to filter companies below
Enforcement economics
—
Of total value · Kagem (—)
—
Penalties last 7 days
Non-core localisation is the dominant category. Statutory-report lateness is high-frequency (many auto-generated after 15 May deadline).
Companies by penalty category
Select a violation type to list every penalised operator. Click a segment on the chart above to jump to that category.
Penalty category
| # | Company | Total (ZMW) | Lines | Last issued |
|---|
Penalty exposure by company (aggregated)
| # | Company | Total (ZMW) | Primary violation |
|---|
Most recent penalty issuances
| Issued | Company | Amount | Category |
|---|
Concentration risk
KAGEM MINING LIMITED — — across multiple local-content lines (— of sector total). Statutory-report penalties are smaller per line but issued in volume since mid-May.
04
Regulatory watchlist
— operators with 3+ compliance gaps in the workbook. — critical (5 gaps); — high (3–4 gaps). Priority outreach before the next reporting cycle.
| Company | Gaps flagged | Count |
|---|
Data methodology & sources
Loading sources…